tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13517920.post7216386872843244310..comments2007-05-03T09:49:21.315-07:00Don Berghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05995517741281465418noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13517920.post-81926193061885217382007-05-03T09:49:00.000-07:002007-05-03T09:49:00.000-07:00

nBoN,<BR/><BR/>I appreciate that standing still is a choice that is generally available, but it is not a method of navigating. Navigating inherently implies movement and even if you stop a journey to get your bearings, you are still "moving" in the sense of being actively engaged in a process that inevitably leads to the continuation of movement. My entire argument is based on the assumption that

Don Berghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05995517741281465418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13517920.post-18460694121080251482007-05-03T01:29:00.000-07:002007-05-03T01:29:00.000-07:00

You say, "There are three ways to navigate; wander, choose a direction, or choose your destination." You forgot the fourth way: stand still. Not acting at all, whether it is simply a failure to act, a failure or indecision to choose other action, or an active choice to do nothing, is unfortunately often overlooked. People are not always motivated to navigate in any direction, but inaction can

nBoNnoreply@blogger.com